List of Important Leading Judgements

  1. M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd Versus State of Maharashtra and others , CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2021 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    Upload Date - 4/13/2021

    We caution the High Courts again against passing such orders of not to arrest or “no coercive steps to be taken” till the investigation is completed and the final report is filed, while not entertaining quashing petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and/or Article 226 of the Constitution of India

    2. M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd Versus State of Maharashtra and others , CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 330 OF 2021 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  2. Kishore Bhadke vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 January, 2017

    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    Upload Date - 1/3/2017

    This Court has held that a joint disclosure or simultaneous disclosures, per se, are not inadmissible under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. Joint or simultaneous disclosure is a myth, because two or more accused persons would not have uttered informatory words in chorus.

    3. Kishore Bhadke vs State Of Maharashtra on 3 January, 2017-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  3. Indra Sarma vs V.K.V.Sarma on 26 November, 2013

    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    Upload Date - 11/26/2013

    All live-in- relationships are not relationships in the nature of marriage. Live-in partners not entitled to protection if one of the partner has a subsisting marriage

    4. Indra Sarma vs V.K.V.Sarma on 26 November, 2013-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  4. Sk. Md. Rafique v. Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others, Civil Appeal No.5808 OF 2017, Dated-January 6, 2020, New Delhi

    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    Upload Date - 1/6/2020

    Held - No Absolute Right Of Appointment For Minority Educational Institutions

    5. Sk. Md. Rafique v. Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others, Civil Appeal No.5808 OF 2017, Dated-January 6, 2020, New Delhi-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  5. Sushila Aggarwal and others Versus State (NCT of Delhi) and another, SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.7281­7282/2017, Dated -January 29, 2020, New Delhi;

    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    Upload Date - 1/29/2020

    Held that no time limit could be fixed while granting anticipatory bail

    6. Sushila Aggarwal and others Versus State (NCT of Delhi) and another, SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.7281­7282/2017, Dated -January 29, 2020, New Delhi;-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  6. ANURADHA BHASIN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. - WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1031 OF 2019 -Dated- JANUARY 10, 2020, New Delhi

    Supreme Court of India
    Upload Date - 1/10/2020

    Internet Shutdown & Restrictions under Section 144, Cr.P.C. in Kashmir Case

    7. ANURADHA BHASIN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. - WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1031 OF 2019 -Dated- JANUARY 10, 2020, New Delhi -Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  7. Arnab Manoranjan Goswami Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. 27 Nov 2020

    Supreme Court of India
    Upload Date - 11/27/2020

    There was a failure of the High Court to discharge its adjudicatory function at two levels – first in declining to evaluate prima facie at the interim stage in a petition for quashing the FIR as to whether an arguable case has been made out, and secondly, in declining interim bail, as a consequence of its failure to render a prima facie opinion on the first. The High Court did have the power to protect the citizen by an interim order in a petition invoking Article 226. Where the High Court has failed to do so, this Court would be abdicating its role and functions as a constitutional court if it refuses to interfere, despite the parameters for such interference being met. The doors of this Court cannot be closed to a citizen who is able to establish prima facie that the instrumentality of the State is being weaponized for using the force of criminal law. Our courts must ensure that they continue to remain the first line of defense against the deprivation of the liberty of citizens. Deprivation of liberty even for a single day is one day too many. We must always be mindful of the deeper systemic implications of our decisions.

    8. Arnab Manoranjan Goswami Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. 27 Nov 2020-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  8. Rajnesh v. Neha and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 730 of 2020 (Decided on 04/11/2020)

    Supreme Court of India
    Upload Date - 11/4/2020

    General Guidelines and Directions - I. Issue of Overlapping Jurisdictions , II. Payment of interim maintenance, III. Criteria for determining quantum of maintenance, IV. Date from which Maintenance to be awarded, V. Enforcement of orders of maintenance, VI. Final Directions

    9. Rajnesh v. Neha and Another, Criminal Appeal No. 730 of 2020 (Decided on 04/11/2020)-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  9. DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Dated - 20/11/1986

    Supreme Court of India
    Upload Date - 11/6/2019

    WHETHER NON-GAZETTED MEMBERS OF THE DELHI POLICE FORCE CAN FORM UNION UNDER ARTICLE 19(1)(C) OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

    10. DELHI POLICE NON-GAZETTEDKARMCHARI SANGH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Dated - 20/11/1986 -Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations

  10. Joseph Shine vs. Union of India, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.194/2017

    Supreme Court of India
    Upload Date - 9/27/2018

    Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 198 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are violative of Articles 14, 15(1), and 21 of the Constitution of India.
     

    11. Joseph Shine vs. Union of India, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.194/2017-Important landmark Supreme Court Leading Cases-Judgements for various judicial services examinations