Article Posted By: laxminarayan99$$66Posted on : 1/15/2025 2:48:48 PM
Indian approach towards law relating to Attempt to Suicide
Share this post
Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) criminalized the act of attempting suicide, stating that "whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such an offense shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine, or both." The provision has been a subject of significant legal, ethical, and social debate over decades.
Judicial Interpretation of Section 309 IPC.
The Supreme Court of India has dealt with the constitutionality and ethical dimensions of Section 309 IPC in various landmark judgments:
1. P. Rathinam v. Union of India (1994):
In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 309 IPC violated Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life. The court opined that the right to life includes the right not to live a forced life and, therefore, an attempt to suicide could not be punished under criminal law. This judgment emphasized the need for compassion rather than punishment for individuals attempting suicide.
2. Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996):
Overruling the decision in P. Rathinam, the Supreme Court declared that the right to life under Article 21 does not include the right to die. The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 309 IPC, asserting that the provision served as a deterrent and was necessary to prevent the trivialization of life.
3. Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011):
Though primarily dealing with euthanasia, the case highlighted the complexities surrounding the right to die. The court recognized passive euthanasia under strict guidelines but maintained a distinction between euthanasia and suicide attempts.
Recent Developments:
Decriminalization and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
Over the years, societal and legislative attitudes toward suicide have shifted. Recognizing suicide attempts as an expression of deep psychological distress rather than criminal intent, the government introduced progressive changes:
1. Mental Healthcare Act, 2017:
Section 115 of this Act effectively decriminalized suicide attempts. It presumes that a person attempting suicide is undergoing severe stress and mandates that such individuals be provided care and rehabilitation instead of punishment. While Section 309 IPC remains in the statute, its application has been rendered largely redundant by this legislation.
2. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), proposed to replace the IPC, represents a modern and humanistic approach to criminal law. In this draft, Section 309 IPC has been omitted, signaling a complete decriminalization of suicide attempts. This move reflects evolving perspectives that prioritize mental health and support systems over punitive measures.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The criminalization of suicide attempts under Section 309 IPC has been criticized for lacking sensitivity to the underlying causes of such acts, including mental illness, financial stress, or personal trauma. The judiciary's stance, though oscillating over time, has paved the way for reform by questioning the provision's relevance and morality. The enactment of the Mental Healthcare Act and the proposed omission of Section 309 in the BNS are commendable steps toward aligning the law with humanitarian values.
The shift from criminalizing suicide attempts to offering care and rehabilitation represents a progressive transformation in India’s legal framework. It underscores the need to treat individuals with empathy and address the root causes of their distress, rather than exacerbating their suffering through legal punishment.
Indian approach towards law relating to Attempt to Suicide
Share this post
Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) criminalized the act of attempting suicide, stating that "whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such an offense shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine, or both." The provision has been a subject of significant legal, ethical, and social debate over decades. Judicial Interpretation of Section 309 IPC.
The Supreme Court of India has dealt with the constitutionality and ethical dimensions of Section 309 IPC in various landmark judgments:
1. P. Rathinam v. Union of India (1994):
In this case, the Supreme Court held that Section 309 IPC violated Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life. The court opined that the right to life includes the right not to live a forced life and, therefore, an attempt to suicide could not be punished under criminal law. This judgment emphasized the need for compassion rather than punishment for individuals attempting suicide.2. Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996):
Overruling the decision in P. Rathinam, the Supreme Court declared that the right to life under Article 21 does not include the right to die. The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 309 IPC, asserting that the provision served as a deterrent and was necessary to prevent the trivialization of life.
3. Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011):
Though primarily dealing with euthanasia, the case highlighted the complexities surrounding the right to die. The court recognized passive euthanasia under strict guidelines but maintained a distinction between euthanasia and suicide attempts.
Recent Developments:
Decriminalization and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Over the years, societal and legislative attitudes toward suicide have shifted. Recognizing suicide attempts as an expression of deep psychological distress rather than criminal intent, the government introduced progressive changes:
1. Mental Healthcare Act, 2017: Section 115 of this Act effectively decriminalized suicide attempts. It presumes that a person attempting suicide is undergoing severe stress and mandates that such individuals be provided care and rehabilitation instead of punishment. While Section 309 IPC remains in the statute, its application has been rendered largely redundant by this legislation.
2. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), proposed to replace the IPC, represents a modern and humanistic approach to criminal law. In this draft, Section 309 IPC has been omitted, signaling a complete decriminalization of suicide attempts. This move reflects evolving perspectives that prioritize mental health and support systems over punitive measures.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The criminalization of suicide attempts under Section 309 IPC has been criticized for lacking sensitivity to the underlying causes of such acts, including mental illness, financial stress, or personal trauma. The judiciary's stance, though oscillating over time, has paved the way for reform by questioning the provision's relevance and morality. The enactment of the Mental Healthcare Act and the proposed omission of Section 309 in the BNS are commendable steps toward aligning the law with humanitarian values. The shift from criminalizing suicide attempts to offering care and rehabilitation represents a progressive transformation in India’s legal framework. It underscores the need to treat individuals with empathy and address the root causes of their distress, rather than exacerbating their suffering through legal punishment.
Back to List