Supreme Court Landmark Judgments for Judiciary Exams
Supreme Court & High Court landmark and most expected judgments are explained for judiciary aspirants.
Kishorekumar Mohan Kale v. Kashmira Kale, [Civil Appeal No. 1342 of 2013]
A foreign divorce decree is not conclusive where the other party did not voluntarily and effectively submit to the foreign courtβs jurisdiction and did not get a meaningful opportunity to contest the case.
Read Full Judgment β
Subramani v. State of Karnataka, Cr. Appeal 2432 of 2010, Decided on 17 March 2026
While appreciation evidentiary value of Dying Declaration, Doctor's Opinion On Victim's Consciousness Prevails Over Police Assessment.
Read Full Judgment β
Sharla Bazliel v. Baldev Thakur and Others, 2026
The Supreme Court held that an FIR alleging forgery, cheating and conspiracy should not be quashed when investigation is incomplete and the handwriting expertβs opinion is still awaited.
Read Full Judgment β
Mohammad Kaleem v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., Decided on 17.03.2026
The Supreme Court held that while exercising power under Section 319 CrPC, courts must not conduct a mini-trial by closely examining contradictions or testing witness credibility as if deciding the case finally. Where evidence recorded during trial is strong enough to show involvement of persons not originally arraigned, they may be summoned as additional accused.
Read Full Judgment β
High Court Should Not Grant Pre-Arrest (Anticipatory Bail While Refusing a petition To Quash FIR. Accused Must First Apply For Such Bail To Sessions Court for Anticipatory Bail as provision of Bail is now available in UP.
Read Full Judgment β
RAJ KUMAR @ BHEEMA V. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No (s). 697 of 2024
Latest SC Guidelines for Contradiction of Witness whose testimoney is recorded through Video Confrerencing.
Read Full Judgment β
MIHIR RAJESH SHAH VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER , SC, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2195 OF 2025
Non Communication of ground of Arrest to accused person is voilative of Art 21 of Constitution, hence arrest illegal, accused entitled to bail.
Read Full Judgment β
S Santhana Lakshmi & Ors vs D Rajammal 2025 INSC 1197
Suit for relief of Simple Injunction Not Enough When Plaintiff Is Not In Possession Of Property & Title Is also Disputed.
Read Full Judgment β
Rahul Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi SC 2025
SC directed trial court to take suo moto cognizance if witness depose falsely favouring accused.
Read Full Judgment β
Gian Chand Garg v. Harpal Singh & Anr. (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 8050 of 2025)
The Supreme Court has held once a complainant signs a compromise deed acknowledging receipt of the full settlement amount, the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be sustained.
Read Full Judgment β
