Most Important Question for Judiciary Exams.
--:--:--
Question 1 of 10
1 . Decide the following;;
(a) The appellant who was convicted under section 411 I.P.C had stated before the investigating officer during the course of investigation; I will point out one Gaddi alias Ram singh of Delhi at Bombay central Railway station as Ill class waiting hall to whom I had given a packet containing diamonds of different sizes more than 200 in number.’’;
The appellant who was convicted under section 411 I.P.C had stated before the investigation officer during the course of investigation; ‘’I will point out one Gaddi alias Ram singh of Delhi at Bombay central railway station at Ill class waiting hall to whom I Had given a packet containing diamonds of different sizes more than 200 in number.’’;
The appellant the pointed out the man as stated who produced as handkerchief containing 211 diamonds, and the same were indentified to be stolen property.;
Say if the statement is admissible under section 27 of evidence Act. Will it make any difference if police know this man, but not his whereabouts?;
(b) The deacesed, a boy of 11 years was found missing . Accused lodged FIR naming three person and stated that ‘’he had taken the boy from Ram’s house on afternoon of January 19. He had kept himself concealed from their view nearby. He heard the sound of something being thrown into the well. Those three persons then ran away, but he himself remained sitting there through out the night and then on peeping into well next morning, observed crops of his son in the well.’’;
Later the accused was arrested and prosecuted for murder. Decide with arguments for an against regarding admissibility of FIR against the accused.;