Landmark Judgments: SC & HC Case Law Analysis

Explore our comprehensive repository of pivotal legal rulings. Designed for Judiciary aspirants, UPSC law optional, and legal practitioners, our summaries focus on the ratio decidendi and constitutional significance of each case.

Legal analysis of RAJA AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1767 OF 2011 - JUDGEMENT DATED-OCTOBER 4, 2016.
Supreme Court of India 04 Oct 2016

RAJA AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1767 OF 2011 - JUDGEMENT DATED-OCTOBER 4, 2016.

Sex Workers cannot lodge a sexual assualt (Rape) complaint against their customers if they refuse to pay money. Further held though the evidence given by a woman alleging rape must get importance from the trial court, but it could not be taken as 'GOSPEL TRUTH'

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of SHARAD BIRDICHAND SARDA V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA; AIR 1984 1622
Supreme Court of India 21 Sep 2016

SHARAD BIRDICHAND SARDA V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA; AIR 1984 1622

IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT-

GOLDEN PRINCIPLES IN CASE OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCES-

1.The circumstances from which the conclusion of guilt is to be drawn should be fully established.

2. The facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused, that is to say, they should not be explainable on any other hypothesis except that the accused is guilty.

3. The circumstances should be of a conclusive nature and tendency.

4. They should exclude every possible hypothesis except the one to be proved and;

5. There must be a chain of evidence so complete as not o leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused.

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of  Youth Bar Association of India Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India 07 Sep 2016

Youth Bar Association of India Vs. Union of India

Copy of first information report shall be made available online except heinous offences

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of Savelife Foundation & ANR. Vs. Union of India & ANR.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 30 Mar 2016

Savelife Foundation & ANR. Vs. Union of India & ANR.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ISSUED GUIDELINES TO SAVE LIFE OF VICTIMS OF ROAD ACCIDENTS BY SAMARITANS i.e ByStanders who are helping them. The petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in public interest for the development of supportive legal framework to protect Samaritans i.e. bystanders and passers-by who render the help to the victims of road accidents. These individuals can play a significant role in order to save lives of the victims by either immediately rushing them to the hospital or providing immediate life saving first aid

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors.     …..Appellants

Versus

The State Information Commission & Anr.    ….Respondents
Supreme Court of India 04 Feb 2016

Kerala Public Service Commission & Ors. …..Appellants Versus The State Information Commission & Anr. ….Respondents

Examiners Identity cannot be revealed under Right to Information Act- Held by Supreme Court of India

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry -16th Dec 2015
Supreme Court of India 16 Dec 2015

Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry -16th Dec 2015

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA COMES WITHIN THE AMBIT OF RTI ACT-

"RBI being the Central Bank is one of the instrumentalities available to the public which as a regulator can inspect such institutions and initiate remedial measures where necessary. It is important that the general public, particularly, the share holders and the depositors of such institutions are kept aware of RBI’s appraisal of the functioning of such institutions and taken into confidence about the remedial actions initiated in specific cases. This will serve the public interest. The RBI would therefore be well advised to be proactive in disclosing information to the public in general and the information seekers under the RTI Act, in particular. The provisions of Section 10(1) of the RTI Act can therefore be judiciously used when necessary to adhere to this objective."

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of Selvi v. State of Karnataka AIR 2010 SC 1974
Supreme Court of India 15 Dec 2015

Selvi v. State of Karnataka AIR 2010 SC 1974

Whether Polygraph Test to accused is an intrusion to personal liberty of accused person or investigative use is justifiable. ? Evidentary Value of polygraph Test

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of Sarla Mugdal, President, kalyani v. Union of India
Supreme Court of India 14 Dec 2015

Sarla Mugdal, President, kalyani v. Union of India

HELD- Conversion to Islam and marrying again would not, by itself , dissolve the hindu marriage. The second marriage by a convert without having first marriage dissolved under the law would therefore be in violation of the act and as such void in terms of section 494 IPC

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of Riju Prasad Sarma v. State of Assam
Supreme Court of India 23 Oct 2015

Riju Prasad Sarma v. State of Assam

Judiciary is not STATE within the purview of article 12 of Constitution of India.- the judiciary in India, acting on its judicial side cannot be considered as a State under Article 12 of the Constitution, and that only when the courts deal with their employees or act in other matters purely in administrative capacity, they may fall within the definition of the State for attracting writ jurisdiction. The Supreme Court also ruled that writs against the judiciary would lie against their administrative actions alone.

View Full Analysis
Legal analysis of Satish Kumar Singh, Advocate 
Vs 
Dr Anil Kumar Yadav, Chairman UPPSC Allahabad & Ors
Allahabad High Court 14 Oct 2015

Satish Kumar Singh, Advocate Vs Dr Anil Kumar Yadav, Chairman UPPSC Allahabad & Ors

Appointment of Dr Anil Kumar Yadav as Chairman of UPPSC is ultra vires, arbitrary and in breach of provisions of Article 316 (1) of the Constitution.

View Full Analysis